Weblog

Monday, 20 December 2010

  • The tragedy of Arnold Schwarzenegger's governorship

    The state's dysfunction isn't all his fault, but it got worse during his time in office because of his failure to come to grips with the real issues of state government.

    December 10, 2010|Michael Hiltzik

    The day he took office, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger commanded popularity enough to persuade California's voters to swallow the harshest fiscal medicine.

    The tragedy of his governorship is that he never used it.

    The roots of the state's dysfunction were well known in Sacramento in 2003, when Schwarzenegger took office, and still are today: It's too easy to enact spending programs by ballot initiative, too hard to get the required two-thirds vote of the Legislature to pass a budget and impossible to keep talented legislators around when they're rapidly turfed out by term limits.

    The tax structure bequeathed us by 1978's Proposition 13 is lunacy; it places too much emphasis on the personal income tax, which frustrates the wealthy and the entrepreneurial class, and on the sales tax, which hammers the working class.

    The school financing system (also an offspring of Proposition 13) is even more nuts. It hamstrings local administrators by making them beholden to nostrums issued from Sacramento.

    Everybody feels shortchanged in this state — rich and poor, employer and employee, student and teacher — and not without reason. This is the crisis Schwarzenegger was elected to solve, and he never laid a finger on it.

    Why? Because these fundamental issues were not on Schwarzenegger's radar screen.

    Schwarzenegger had some good qualities as governor and some sound instincts. Very early on he heeded the call to reform the worker's compensation system, though he probably didn't go far enough. His environmental initiatives met the most progressive standards, and we owe him gratitude for helping to fight off the mendacious Proposition 24 campaign to roll those initiatives back in November.

    He understood the need for healthcare reform, even if he couldn't get it done. For the most part he didn't let braying right-wing Republicans (about all that's left of the GOP in California) move him off socially moderate positions on gay rights and similar issues.

    Yet on the central issue of his tenure, fiscal reform, Schwarzenegger proved to be an action star with feet of clay.

    Why is that? Perhaps the reason is that the state's persistent budget crisis is deeply interwoven with the flaws in its government structure, and untangling that mess requires both hard labor and imagination.

Wednesday, 28 April 2010

  • amy - good advice

    DEAR AMY: I have had several friends or acquaintances over the years, both socially and at work, who appeared to be in serious need of professional counseling but have turned to me and/or other friends instead of a licensed therapist.

    One woman I only knew casually at work came by my desk at the end of the day and said, "Give me three reasons why I shouldn't kill myself." This threw me into a panic, and I spent several hours after work talking to her.

    She didn't make any suicidal gestures but continues to attempt to involve me in high drama over issues in her life.

    I don't want to be unkind, but I would like to communicate some clear boundaries, perhaps early in the relationship, before the person gets the notion that I can provide counseling assistance.

    Any suggestions? --Concerned Coworker

    DEAR CONCERNED: This is way above your pay grade, and I share your concern about being a reluctant, unprepared and unlicensed counselor.

    You are obviously a compassionate person. But don't let your colleagues suck you into this emotional vortex. Not only are you unqualified to talk someone off a ledge, but this is very emotionally burdensome for you. Talking to you also creates a potentially dangerous illusion for others that they are getting the help they require.

    It's OK to say, "I'm worried about you but I don't know how to help. You should really see a professional because I'm sure someone could help you. I think HR can help refer you to a counselor." If someone says she is suicidal and you are worried she might be serious (or are unsure), you should call 911.

    DEAR AMY: This is in response to "Grateful Niece," who thinks the job of aunts and uncles is to correct the behavior of their nieces and nephews by means of gift-giving that will "teach them a lesson." Teenagers are teenagers, and their behavior and demeanor can be irritating.

    I know I was often ungrateful and ungracious during those years.

    The relatives who let me know they loved me without conditions gave me space to develop into a more openhearted and loving adult. They set an example, rather than use their irritation to punish me. --Another Grateful Niece

    DEAR NIECE: I agree with this more patient approach.

Tuesday, 10 February 2009

  • misc

    We’re takers mom. That’s all we’ve ever done is take. I want to give back
    Don’t bullshit a bullshitter
    Don’t think your are kidding anyone.  Yes, there are trusting people.  But there are also people who have been burned again and again by people they have wanted to help.  Every time that happens, your skin gets a little harder, there is one more scab on your heart.  Hopefully you remain open to the goodness in people but you also come to realize when you are being worked.
     
    courtesy of a reader who offered to pay for several nights of lodging. Two dozen readers and counting have offered housing of some type, and hundreds offered financial help.
     
    "I have a rather roomy 2-story house in Sherman Oaks, close to the 405 and 101 intersections, with an extra bedroom and bathroom on the ground floor that I would be happy to have Kerry and Destiny use," wrote a reader named Lynn.
     
    "We have two spare bedrooms they could use if that would help them out of a very bad situation," wrote Joy, of Northridge.
     
    In the Hollywood Hills, a mother who has three kids and is pregnant with a fourth offered to take in the Himmels. She said her husband is an emergency room doctor, so he'd be able to keep an eye on Destiny.
     
    "I should probably admit that it can be a little loud around here -- and is probably going to get worse when our new baby arrives next month," wrote Jennie. "But it's warm, clean, and there's lots of food in the fridge."
     
    Kerry Himmel was thrilled to hear about the offers. But I told her there was more to the response than kindness and cheer.
     
    Another reader encouraged me to call Winter Kelly, an executive with Canyon News, a chain of Westside weeklies. When I reached her, Kelly told me she had taken the Himmels into her Beverly Hills apartment in 2007 after Kerry Himmel complained of being destitute and asked for help.
     
    Kelly said she gave Kerry Himmel a part-time job calling on advertising accounts in exchange for rent. She could also earn commissions on top of that.
     
    But Himmel decided to leave the job and the apartment after only one month . Kelly said she was surprised by the decision, and concluded Himmel preferred being homeless to working for a living, even though she had a daughter to care for.
     
    When I confronted Kerry Himmel on Monday morning, I reminded her she had told me she hadn't lived indoors in years. So what about that month in Beverly Hills?
     
    "I honestly forgot about that," she said in the lobby of Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, where Destiny was being treated upstairs. She said the work didn't suit her and there was a pay dispute. She said she left the apartment because she thought Kelly was trying to come between mother and daughter.
     
    From the beginning, I'd been sympathetic to the Himmels' plight, particularly given Destiny's illness, which was diagnosed in April 2008. But I was getting more concerned about Kerry Himmel's judgment.
     
    "God can strike me down," the former truck driver said defiantly, insisting she has "done nothing but try to get back on my feet."
     
    One would hope so, particularly for Destiny's sake.
     
    There's no denying that these are hard times for lots of people, and homelessness is a tragedy that hits thousands. Individual stories can be complicated, though, and as I wrote on Sunday, once you've been out there for years you can lose perspective.
     
    Still, there is no acceptable reason, in the end, for having a child live in an SUV while fighting leukemia.
     
    On Sunday, I answered reader requests by telling them they could send checks to the Himmels in my care at The Times. Since then, I've come up with a better plan.
     
    Paul Freese of Public Counsel has agreed to meet with the Himmels, and, if they're willing, to offer legal advice on housing and benefits. And he also referred me to Imagine LA, a nonprofit that describes itself as being "dedicated to making Los Angeles a city where no child sleeps on the street."
     
    Jill Bauman, executive director of Imagine LA, has agreed to manage a fund for the Himmels. "Imagine LA's goal," she said, "is to quickly move homeless families into permanent housing and provide the structure to nurture, train and mentor them to create habits that will help them sustain their independence and even thrive."
     
    I'll pass on to Imagine LA any checks that have already been sent to me directly. In the meantime, donations can be made online

Friday, 17 October 2008

Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.

Recommended